Calculator - Compare SlimDrill Savings | Verde
06
Try the numbers

See what SlimDrill means for your project.

Your geological exploration program

Estimate the savings on a typical drilling campaign vs conventional rigs. Indicative - final figures depend on geology and logistics.

2500 m
1,500 m5,500 m
10
150
Conventional rig $24.0M
CAPEX: $14.0M Mobilization: $4.0M Consumables: $6.0M
SlimDrill $10.5M
CAPEX: $5.6M Mobilization: $1.4M Consumables: $3.5M
You save $13.5M
56% less total program cost
~3,200 m³
Drilling mud avoided
~280 t
Steel saved (casing)
~120
Days saved on schedule

Indicative estimates based on field-tested ratios from 51 drilled wells. Final business case requires geological and logistical input - get in touch for a project-specific quote.

Side-by-side comparison

Drag the slider to set the target depth, and see how the rigs scale.

2500 m
1,000 m5,500 m
32 m
2,500 m
Conventional BU2500
80×100 m
25-35 crew
~4,800 m³ mud volume
~95 d drilling cycle
14 m
2,500 m
SlimDrill v1.0
40×50 m
10-14 crew
~1,200 m³ mud volume
~42 d drilling cycle

Find the right rig

Tell us about your project - we will recommend the SlimDrill model that fits.

Target depth
Primary objective
Site logistics
Recommended model
SlimDrill v1.0
2.0 km depth

The original SlimDrill - proven across 40+ wells. Best for shallow geological exploration with full coring capability.

Mast 14 m
Lift capacity 20+20 t
Status In operation
Discuss this configuration

Ready to talk specifics?

Send us your field details and we will return a tailored technical-economic estimate.

Contact the team →